Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement | |
---|---|---|---|
Writing / Content / Ideas | Your post meets the guidelines for this assignment, and adds significant value via your commentary. Your post demonstrates nuance, complexity, and a deep comprehension of this source and how it fits in the field of public history. | Your post meets the guidelines for this assignment, and demonstrates you've read and understood the resource you've shared. Your post adds content and commentary to this resource beyond the content of the resource itself. | Your post doesn't quite follow the assignment guidelines, and/or it shows lack of attention to complexity, contradictions, and nuance. Your post is too general and is not explaining the resource's importance or relevance. |
Professionalism | Your post is clear, concise, and well-written, beyond the minimum expectations. | Your post follows basic rules for clear writing. It is proofread, and is well-written in an appropriately professional tone. Your post met all requirements. | Your post would be stronger if you invested more time in proofreading and revisions. Your post may not have met all of the requirements. |