Content
|
This project goes above and beyond in:
its recognition of multiple perspectives
its development of an engaging and exciting narrative
its innovative and interesting viewpoint
its proofreading and editing (no visible errors)
|
This project:
Recognizes multiple and diverse perspectives (and uses a variety of sources to do this)
Balances subjectivity and objectivity
Cites sources correctly
Develops a compelling narrative
Includes detailed examples
Is carefully proofread with few errors
|
This project:
Recognizes only a single perspective
Uses only a single source or type of source
Fails to cite sources (or does so incorrectly)
Lacks a compelling narrative or detailed examples
is poorly proofread or poorly written
|
Functionality and accessibility
|
This project goes above and beyond by providing additional functionality and accessibility such as:
multilingual features
user guide / tour
features to improve access for hearing-/vision-impaired visitors
|
This project:
is functional (no broken parts)
is user-friendly
|
This project:
has broken components
is difficult / not intuitive to use |
Aesthestics & Organization
|
This project goes above and beyond by including:
top notch design and layout
|
This project:
is pleasant to look at and use (including a pleasant color scheme)
has an organized layout
shows consistency in its layout, fonts, and other components
|
This project:
has a displeasing color scheme or layout
is outdated in its design scheme
|
Engagement & Relevance
|
This project:
brings about strong emotional responses from viewers (e.g. Sarah Maclachan's Animal commercials)
goes above and beyond in its engagement and relevance
|
This project is:
interactive
relevant and relatable
targeted to a public audience
|
This project is:
static (not interactive / engaging)
doesn't take advantage of the digital format/tools
incomplete
not relevant or accessible to a public audience
|